The Coronavirus pandemic has caused upheaval and apprehension for everyone. But for some young people like me, there has been added stress and worry due to being classed as clinically vulnerable.
Immunocompromised people have weaker immune systems which could be as a result of illness or taking medication. In my case it is caused by medication that I take to control a form of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) called ulcerative colitis which is an auto-immune disease. People who suffer from auto-immune diseases have an abnormal immune response, which means that their body mistakenly attacks healthy cells as it should attack against bacteria or viruses.
In April 2020 the NHS advised ‘high-risk’ people to shield for a minimum of 12 weeks. Many young people in this category feel that they have been overlooked. This is especially true for those who appear to be able-bodied and have ‘invisible illnesses’ that are not obvious from the outside.
I talked to some other young people about their experiences of shielding; how it affected their mental health and what they did to alleviate their worries and anxieties, as well as their thoughts and fears going forward as the country starts to ease lockdown.
The effects of shielding on mental health
Nel, 23, who has severe asthma and generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), said that her mental health suffered as a result of the pandemic and that it was easy to ‘get engulfed by the constant stream of terrifying and depressing news’. The unavoidable news stories about deaths from Covid and its potential long term effects ended up frightening Nel and increasing her anxiety, leading her to decide to take a break from reading the news altogether.
Nel also felt that the public health messaging at the beginning of the pandemic, which focused upon herd immunity, was reckless and frightening for her as a high-risk person.
Nina, 36, takes immunosuppressant medication to stop her body rejecting her kidney transplant. Nina lives alone in a block of flats without an outdoor space, so lockdown was especially isolating for her in the first few weeks before the support bubbles were introduced. Nina had socially distanced meet-ups and video chats with her partner, but being physically apart was difficult. Nina and her partner decided to form a support bubble before the government advice was introduced, and luckily for Nina her partner is self-employed, so they were able to isolate for 14 days before going to meet with her.
Lottie, 34, lives with a chronic lung condition called Cystic Fibrosis (CF) and has a 44% lung function; she knew early on that she would be classed as vulnerable and be expected to shield. Lottie said that lockdown didn’t affect her mental health as badly as she had first anticipated, however her physical health did suffer.
Having to isolate meant that Lottie could not go outside to walk for daily exercise, which would have usually helped to keep her lung function stable. By week three of lockdown, Lottie’s lung function had dropped to only 38%. After a discussion with her clinical team, Lottie was advised to continue exercising outside every day, despite this technically being against government guidelines for people with her medical condition.
One thought that did play on Lottie’s mind was something that she discovered through her own research, which was that the NHS has a scoring system for the use of ventilators. This meant that if Lottie did contract Covid and there were a shortage of ventilators, she probably ‘wouldn’t have made the cut’. Lottie said that this was a sobering reality and very hard for her to forget.

Artie, 25, who takes immunosuppressant medication for Crohn’s disease and Takayasu’s arteritis, said their mental health suffered as a result of lockdown. They said that they had been struggling with their MH before as a result of coping with their poor physical health, and dealing with the isolation caused by lockdown was ‘a lot to handle all at once’. During lockdown Artie started with a therapist through a local low-cost counselling service via video chat. Artie found this service useful and will continue with it in future. Interestingly, having to do therapy at a distance was a positive for Artie: ‘The actual act of therapy isn’t the issue for me; it’s often the travel and getting there on time that gives me a lot of anxiety’.
Conversely, Nel found that although her online counselling during lockdown was useful, she felt restricted by it as she often worried that her housemates could hear her sessions through the walls, causing her to be less open than she might have been had the sessions been face to face.
Jess, 28, has pulmonary hypertension which is a serious condition that causes progressive damage to the heart and lungs due to high pressure in the pulmonary arteries. Jess says that having to shield made her feel like she lost her identity. Jess said that she felt as though she had gone from being a normal 28 year old, to being ‘lumped into a category with [her] grandparents’. Jess says that it was difficult to deal with people who didn’t understand her condition and thought that she was being ‘overdramatic’. She and her husband (who shielded alongside her), spent almost 100 days isolating in their one bedroom flat with little other human interaction. Lockdown was a mixture of highs and lows for Jess: ‘I would spend whole days crying, then the next few days I’d be back on track’.
How shielders got through lockdown
It seems that for the majority of shielders, it wasn’t all doom and gloom in lockdown despite there being some dark days. Most of the people that I talked to managed to use the time to improve themselves by taking on new hobbies and projects, or made the most of the time they had to do the things they enjoy.
Artie tried to make their enforced isolation into a positive by doing tasks that they usually wouldn’t have had time for otherwise: ‘engaging in exercise, having a clear out, tackling things we maybe don’t always get to because it’s a big annoying job. I think a mixture of everything helped a lot.’ Artie also read a lot of books (35 this year!) and binged on Netflix.
Nel says that she found comfort in getting into gardening during lockdown and buying lots of plants for her flat’s courtyard: ‘Being able to nurture plants and watching them grow was actually really satisfying’ Nel remarked. She also said that she felt privileged to live so close to the seafront, and found that the occasional walk and seeing the sunset was great for improving her mental health.
Lottie explained that she is a long-time advocate of meditation, but that she didn’t particularly use it as a tool to help her cope during lockdown. ‘If I was having a bad day, I found getting on my exercise bike or calling someone to be the most helpful.’ Lottie says that at times it was good to just give herself a break and accept that things were hard and overwhelming. Lottie used lockdown to try out a whole host of different activities such as playing the ukulele, making her own lip balms and glosses, learning Spanish, and quilt making. Like Artie, Lottie found that she read more books than ever ‘That was a real form of escapism for me and continues to be’.

Jess said that she also did a variety of different activities during lockdown, such as playing the keyboard, painting, learning a language and even starting a midsize fashion account on Instagram. Jess has vowed to keep up with most of her hobbies going forward, as she loves the escapism that they bring her.
Nina works as a hypnotherapist, and she used her skills to do some self-hypnosis in order to release stress. Like Nel, Nina found it useful to take a break from the news in order to reduce her anxiety.
What should everybody know about those classed as clinically vulnerable?
It appears that there is a lack of understanding that people with chronic illnesses are navigating all the same things as ‘healthy’ people, alongside having to deal with a severe health condition. Lottie remarked that there seems to be a presumption that all those shielding are elderly, retired, or not at work.
The majority of the people I talked to also wanted to remind anyone who has a friend or family member who is or was shielding, to continue to check in on them. As Lottie put it: ‘I appreciated so much the friends that took the time[…]and who sent little notes or presents to brighten the long days. A lot of people I know didn’t, and I know this was not a reflection of them not caring but rather presuming like every day I was just getting on with it’. Nel also said that a big part of getting through lockdown for her was receiving care packages from the friends and family that she couldn’t be with. Nel also sent back packages to her loved ones, and said that this was a wonderful way to stay connected with them.

Artie said that they took people disregarding government guidelines very personally, and that the public should be more aware of why the guidelines are in place: ‘The blatant disregard and lack of care for disabled and chronically ill people is appalling. I don’t know how people just don’t care about other people’. Nina says that she wishes the general public would not overlook people with disabilities and long-term conditions: ‘[It] doesn’t mean that we are unhealthy and on our deathbed. I was very shocked at the attitude of some that high-risk people were expendable because we are “old and sick”. I could die soon if I catch Covid but I am still an active and productive member of society with many years left to live. I thought it was very ageist and ableist.’
What now for ‘high-risk’ people?
The government now advises that vulnerable people no longer have to shield. However, as we know, a worrying spike in Coronavirus cases at the beginning of September led to the government banning social gatherings above 6 in England from September 14th.
Lottie says that she feels very lucky to have an understanding employer who has eased her worries about returning to work. ‘I’ve had a very rigorous risk assessment and told them my expectations if I were to return to the office. A very robust plan is in place… I’m actually looking forward to it.’
Artie says that they feel comfortable going into shops if they have plenty of space and look uncrowded, but that it will be some time before they feel comfortable going to restaurants. Lottie says that she has visited restaurants, but only ones that she was confident had properly distanced tables, disposable menus, and staff wearing masks.
Nina explained that she is not confident that her workplace is entirely ‘Covid-safe’. Nina says that she does not have a choice about going back to work as her employer will not continue to pay her if she continues to shield as it is not part of the government advice going forward. Nina feels that her employer should have undertaken a better risk-assessment, and that the government advice to end shielding has been used as leverage to manipulate her into coming back to work, despite her not feeling fully confident to do so.
The people I talked to (as well as myself) have begun to make their minds up about what they deem safe to do. Still, essentially this does mean that vulnerable people have been left to decide for themselves what level of risk they consider acceptable. The government advice has not been incredibly specific beyond telling us that we do not have to shield, but that we should ‘remain cautious’. I have found that connecting with other vulnerable people and discussing how to go about our daily lives safely has been more useful than any advice the government has given!
Special thanks to Artie Carden (instagram.com/artiecarden) for sharing their experiences and being a willing interviewee for this piece! Artie also has a blog which you can check out here: https://artiecarden.com, and a YouTube channel youtube.com/c/artiecarden. I love Artie’s posts about the books they have been reading in lockdown, there are so many great recommendations!



